Posted by: warnick68 | January 2, 2009

By What Right?

I haven’t paid much attention to the political scandal concerning Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. It looked ass though it was turning into a witch hunt to damage Barack Obama rather than focus on the criminal activities of Blagojevich.

Even a cursory glance at the known facts seem to reveal a few things.

Blagojevich is a corrupt politician

Barack Obama has broken his promise of a transparent administration

Barack Obama is not criminally involved

The Illinois political machine is broken

Out of all of this what I have found the most interesting is the refusal by Senate Democrats to seat Roland Burris who is the pick of Rod Blagojevich to fill the seat vacated by Barack Obama.

I’m not defending Blagojevich in anyway, he should be removed from office, but he has not been and since he has not been does he not still hold the right to fill the empty seat?

Of even more interest to me than if the governor does or does not have the right to appoint Burris is, does the Senate have the right to refuse to seat him and if so based upon what?

When reading Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America I see the following:

No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

  1. Roland Burris is above the age of 30
  2. Roland Burris has been a United States citizen for more than nine years
  3. Roland Burris is a inhabitant of the state of Illinois

Being that he meets these three requirements I am curious as to how it is the Senate Democrats can rightfully refuse to seat him.

Trust me, I’ve no desire to see another Dem fill a Senate seat, but at the same time it appears to me that the Senate Democrats are acting beyond what is allowed them and I find that far more disturbing.

 

UPDATE: WSJ article concerning the seating of Burris

Advertisements

Responses

  1. I agree with most of what you said. I don’t understand why you threw in that Obama broke his promise. He gathered all the pertinent information in just a few days, even more than the FBI requested, and they had to hold back on releasing the info to the public because the guys running the investigation told them to. You really can’t ask any more from the guy.

  2. I threw it in because he broke his promise.

  3. […] Obama, Blagojevich, Harry Reid, Illinois, Rod Blagojevich, Rolan Burris, senate |   I posted here on Friday asking by what right will Harry Reid refuse to seat the pick of Roland Burris by corrupt […]

  4. […] I Ask, By What Right I posted here on Friday asking by what right will Harry Reid refuse to seat the pick of Roland Burris by corrupt […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories